Subpar music experience: There's only 2.5GB of onboard music storage on the Versa, and tracks have to be loaded from a computer, unless you subscribe to Pandora or Deezer and sync playlists with those services. To that end, here's where the Versa fell short compared to Apple: But with that comes tighter integration with the iPhone (my preferred phone platform), plus the benefit of more mature features, which Apple has been polishing and refining since the first model debuted in 2015.
Yes, the Apple Watch - even the "affordable" Series 1 model - is more expensive than the Fitbit Versa. I have, however, decided I like the variety.
But Fitbit's mixed bag of watch faces shows the importance of good curation: a ton of bad-looking watch faces could be seen as worse than a few really good ones. The Apple Watch doesn't have a watch face store, something that feels ridiculously overdue (and could be coming this year, based on early WatchOS 4.3.1 reports). That gets annoying, because the Fitbit app loads apps slowly, and sometimes requires the Fitbit to be connected to Wi-Fi, which has to be connected manually from the Fitbit app running on a phone. And, oddly, only one watch face at a time can be stored. To make things worse, there's no way I can bookmark or otherwise save my "favorite" watch faces. But it does mean a lot of sifting through the Fitbit app for nuggets. (Some are free trials that eventually require payment beyond Fitbit's app, which gets weird.) It's a hobbyist or grassroots developer landscape, much like Pebble was. 3/10 /2CxfFIYEee- Scott Stein April 11, 2018Īdmittedly, developers are making these fast, and mostly for free. Going to start microreviewing random Fitbit Versa watch faces.īig Simple: bleh.
0 kommentar(er)
